|
|
CHICAGO | NEW YORK | SAN DIEGO | SAN FRANCISCO |
|---|
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PARTNERSHIP ISSUES
Code Section 1031(a)(2) excludes the exchange of a partnership interest, except where the partnership has, in effect, a valid election under Code Section 761(a) to be excluded from the application of subchapter K, in which case the interest shall be treated as an interest in each of the assets of the partnership, and not as an interest in a partnership.
If an election under Code Section 761(a) is not feasible, partners may attempt to dissolve the partnership in front of the exchange - the "Drop and Swap" method - where each partner receives a tenancy-in-common interest in the property and decides individually to either sell or exchange their interest.
Alternatively, the partnership may complete the exchange at the partnership level and dissolve the partnership at some point in the future - the "Swap and Drop" method. In this scenario, the partnership dissolves and distributes tenancy-in-common interests to the individual partners. Each individual can then either sell or continue to hold its interest.
The "Drop and Swap" and "Swap and Drop" options are not without risk. The holding period of the partnership does not tack to the individual taxpayers when the partnership is dissolved. The Service could conclude the property was not held by the individual taxpayers for use in a trade or business, or for investment, but was held for sale.